作者:香水有时有毒

每一个在美的华人都可以到当地的法院去控告cnn和卡弗蒂，索赔500美金。你只需花50美金。你也可能得不到赔偿，因为你无法证明你遭受500美金的损失。但每一个案件就要花掉cnn 1000美金， 而且cnn也不能反告你，因为你没有给cnn造成损失。如果有5000个华人这样做，cnn必须马上应诉。你可以在美国任何地方上诉，越偏远的地方越好。

我是这样做的：
我在堪沙斯州，我在一民事法庭对cnn及卡弗蒂提出索赔控诉。 cnn的地址：
Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER
NEW YORK, NY 10019
Telephone 2124848000

我的理由：cnn的雇员卡弗蒂当众辱骂中国人是一群暴徒和傻子， 伤害了我的名誉，导致我损失了500美金。

分析：
1， 为什么500美金？
在堪萨斯州，500美金以下的案件，我只需出30美金的上诉费，500美金以上，我要付50美金。
2， 下一步。
我寄挂号信寄给被告。

3， 以后会怎样？
a, 如果被告未出庭，cnn赔我500美金，外加我那30美金诉讼费。
b, 如果被告的律师出庭，我有可能就输了，因为我拿不出证据，我顶多就损失那30美金。
c, 对方律师有可能打电话给我要求庭外和解。我要求解雇卡弗蒂，否则，法庭上见。

无论怎样，cnn要花大笔的律师费。

问：如果我不是美国公民，我可不可以上诉？
美国法律说，不是美国公民都可以告。

问：可不可以群体上诉？
可以，但效果不好。因为你提不出证据你损失了500美金。这就是为什么我们要人多，而且要在不同的地方上诉，越多越好。



下面是原文内容：

原文写得更好！！我译了一些。
Every Chinese in America goes to the local small claim court and to file a small claim ($500) against CNN and Cafferty. It will cost you $50 or so to do it, you are probably not going to win (since you have no way to prove that you have the $500 financial damage). But it will cost CNN $1000 or more to defend each case, they can not counter-sue you either, because you did not cause damage to them. If we have 5000 to do so, they will act right away. You can do it anywhere in USA, the more remote location the better.  
. This is what I did.
I filed a small claim in a county small claim court in Kansas. The defandant is TIME WARNER INC.
Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER
NEW YORK, NY 10019
Telephone 2124848000  
My claim: Time Warner employee, Jack Cafferty in a publically broadcasted TV news program (CNN) asserted Chinese are a bunch of 'goons'. This statement severely damaged my credit, which resulted $500 financial loss to my business.  
Analysis: 1. why $500?
A: In Kansas, $500 or less, the filing fee is $30, otherwise it will be $50.
2. What is the next step?
In Kansas, you just need to use registered mail to mail it to the defendant, other states may require you to use law enforcement to serve a summon, which will cost you $25 to $50.
3. What will happen?
a) If the defendant does not show up, the judge will make a default judgment, that means, Time Warner will pay me $500, plus the $30 court fee.
b) If the defendant send an attorney to the court at the court date, (which is 3 weeks later, the defendant can request a postpone), then the judge will probably make a judgment to the defendant (I lose) since I can not provide evidence that I had the $500 damage. Then I lose the $30 court fee, that is it.
c) The defendant attorney could call me before the court date, try to settle it outside the court, or try to persuade me to withdraw by threatening counter-suing me, (which I know they can't, I did not do anything to cause them damage, suing them does not count).
I am waiting for their call, I am willing to settle outside the court, my request is "CNN fires Jack Cafferty." Otherwise, I will see you in court.  
No matter what, it will cost them a lot of money for the attorney fee.  
Why not a class-action lawsuit?
Can anyone provide evidences that you really suffered material damage? Otherwise, you do not have a case.
Besides, all big companies in US have one kind or another lawsuit ongoing, they are not afraid of one or two lawsuits. But, will they defend 1000 or 5000 suits to protect a worth-less employee?
This is why we need to have as many people as possible to file the suit in as many places as possible.  
Can we sue Cafferty only?
No, it is very hard for a local court to enforce a judgment against an out-of-state person, many courts will not accept these type of suit. Even the case is accepted, the judge can still dismiss the case, (you will lose your court fee). Even a judgment is made in your favor, you will not be able to collect anything from him.  
Can I sue if I am not a US citizen?
Anybody can file the suit. Please do it, this is American experience.  
Is there any negative consequence on me if I sue?
If you lose, I will lose the court fee. If you are going to apply a mortgage DURING the suit, you need to disclose it , it may not affect your mortgage application at all. Other than that, no negative effects on you. It will NOT have anything to do with your green card application.  
Will it damage the Chinese image by filing so many lawsuits?
I don't know how will other people think. It is a common practice for Americans. If you do not fight the American way, you lose already, what good is your image for?  
Sorry, written in a hurry, there might be mis-information

 ==========================================================

异想天开还差不多

1. 这是给CNN送钱，没错，姑且不考虑CNN是否会反诉以及败诉后是否会赔偿的情况，也就是所谓“高智商”说的最理想情况，你只损失$30，那么CNN收入$30

CNN的完全可以签约一个律师团队，专门做这个（CNN这样的大公司法律团队是必备的），因为你们根本不敢出庭，更不用提交证据或者上诉，律师团队只要处理好第一个case，以后就是完全机械化的copy，almost zero work，甚至连律师团队估计也可以省了，雇个attorney就搞定了。如果有1万个傻X中国人干这个，法庭耗时1年处理完这1万个case，那么CNN收入30万，除去attorney的费用(这种极其低技术含量的工作一年就算10万吧），剩下最大的开销估计是邮费和打印费（至少1万份档案要归档吧，虽然可以电子化也要花钱的），估计一份$10，那么CNN净赚10万

如果CNN反诉你们诽谤要求赔偿，看你们怎么办？！你们去请律师？？请的起吗？

你们这帮白痴！

2. 不考虑钱了，就算CNN不赚钱，甚至还就如“高智商”说的，还亏了，那么CNN会坐以待毙吗？？？他们最迟在100个case以后立刻会向法庭申请不受理法令，凡是这种类似的case都不受理。法官看到这种弱智的官司让CNN连赢100场，你要是法官你怎么做？？？继续做这种只有傻X自以为是爱耍小聪明的中国人才喜欢玩的游戏吗？？？？当然是停止受理！！！！！！！！然后呢，整个世界清净了。。。。

3. 要不就不要打，要打官司就要打赢，否则这种无赖+阿Q的做法就是丢中国人的脸！！！！还高智商，高傻B才还差不多！！！

这种白痴的可怜的事情只有中国人才能想的出，而且还有一帮更弱智的在叫好，唉